Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(9): 960-971, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35595024

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of cesarean delivery (CD) and examine associations between mode of delivery (MOD) and maternal and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a Canadian multicentre birth cohort derived from provincial data collected in 2008/2009. Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes were compared between vaginal and cesarean birth and between the following MOD subgroups: spontaneous vaginal delivery (VD), assisted VD, planned cesarean delivery (CD), and intrapartum CD. Multivariate regression identified determinants of CD and the effects of MOD and previous CD on maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 264 755 births (72.1% VD and 27.9% CD) from 91 participating institutions. Determinants of CD included maternal age, parity, previous CD, chronic hypertension, diabetes, urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis, gestational hypertension, vaginal bleeding, labour induction, pre-term gestational age, low birth weight, large for gestational age, malpresentation, and male sex. CD was associated with greater risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with assisted VD and intrapartum CD than spontaneous VD. Planned CD reduced the risk of obstetric wound hematoma and perinatal mortality but increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Previous CD increased the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity among multiparous women. CONCLUSIONS: The CD rate in Canada is consistent with global trends reflecting demographic and obstetric intervention factors. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with CD warrants evaluation of interventions to safely prevent nonessential cesarean birth.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Canadá/epidemiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 42(1): 5-6, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882060
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 39(6): 411-412, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527606
7.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 39(6): 413-415, 2017 06.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527607
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 38(9): 791-792, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670702
11.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 38(9): 793-794, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670703
12.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 30(7): 581-585, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18644179

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the financial implications of establishing a hysteroscopic sterilization program using the Essure micro-insert tubal sterilization system in an ambulatory clinic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification Type II-2), in an ambulatory women's health clinic in a tertiary hospital, of 108 women undergoing Essure coil insertion between 2005 and 2006, and 104 women undergoing laparoscopic tubal sterilization for permanent sterilization between 2001 and 2004. The Essure procedures used a 4 mm single channel operative hysteroscope and conscious sedation (fentanyl and midazolam); the laparoscopic tubal sterilizations were completed under general anaesthesia with a 7 mm laparoscope and either bipolar cautery or Filshie clips. Costs associated with the procedure, follow-up, and management of any complications (including nursing, hospital charges, equipment, and disposables) were tabulated. RESULTS: The Essure coils were successfully placed on the first attempt in 103 of 108 women (95%). Three patients required a second attempt to complete placement and two patients required laparoscopic tubal sterilization after an unsuccessful Essure. All 104 laparoscopic tubals were completed on the first attempt with no complications reported. The total cost for the 108 Essure procedures, including follow-up evaluation, was $138,996 or $1287 per case. The total cost associated with the 104 laparoscopic tubal sterilization procedures was $148,227 or $1398 per case. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $111. CONCLUSIONS: The Essure procedure in an ambulatory setting resulted in a statistically significant cost saving of $111 per sterilization procedure. Carrying out the Essure procedure in an ambulatory setting frees space in the operating room for other types of cases, improving access to care for more patients.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/economia , Esterilização Tubária/economia , Esterilização Tubária/instrumentação , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esterilização Tubária/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...